76
76
Nov 14, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i think the unions made better advantage of a lot of the super pac money channeling into organizing as and voter turnout as opposed to advertising. obama's advertising may through july which nobody really responded to, which in my view defined romney in very negative terms. >> it did. and once you get defined it is tough to unravel that. just to your point it probably did make a big difference, steve because, if super pacs hadn't been out there on the republican side the others would be out there anyway. you would have seen a country not so evenly divided probably because advertising dollars would have mept larger margins in these states. in the end mitt romney loss but in the end it didn't make a difference. i will also say when you can not coordinate between a campaign and someone else helping you, sometimes the ads are less helpful. some of the ads were good. some of them weren't. some of them were off message. and in your business, think about it with your markets efforts. if you had to have a marketing team within your business but also an outside marketing team you had no cont
>> i think the unions made better advantage of a lot of the super pac money channeling into organizing as and voter turnout as opposed to advertising. obama's advertising may through july which nobody really responded to, which in my view defined romney in very negative terms. >> it did. and once you get defined it is tough to unravel that. just to your point it probably did make a big difference, steve because, if super pacs hadn't been out there on the republican side the others...
141
141
Nov 14, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 141
favorite 0
quote 0
, and then they are told by people like paul ryan and mitt romney that that is an entitlement. to me, that is like more of a ponzi scheme if they take that away. getting back to the elephant in the room, until we start talking about structurally change in this country beyond fighting over taxes -- you can fight over moving around the chairs on the titanic, but what really needs to be done is we need to repeal the trade agreement, look at taxing goods from china, and we need to get jobs back into this country, manufacturing jobs with wages people can live on and pressure for wages to go up. right now, the pressure is for wages to go down. you are fighting over what is less of the money coming in. host: let's go to the congressman. guest: this is an important issue that was fought over in the campaign. we need to support manufacturing in this country. i come from michigan. that was a basic issue. the president, when he stood up for the auto industry, essentially answered your collar pulled a question about the importance of manufacturing -- collar's question about the importance
, and then they are told by people like paul ryan and mitt romney that that is an entitlement. to me, that is like more of a ponzi scheme if they take that away. getting back to the elephant in the room, until we start talking about structurally change in this country beyond fighting over taxes -- you can fight over moving around the chairs on the titanic, but what really needs to be done is we need to repeal the trade agreement, look at taxing goods from china, and we need to get jobs back...
115
115
Nov 14, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 115
favorite 0
quote 0
>> the unions may better advantage of a lot of the super pac money, channeling it into other things. the other issue was obama's advertising. and they made which nobody responded to it. >> it probably did it a difference because >> in the end, mitt romney loss but it does not mean it did not make a difference. many cannot afford a petition campaign and someone else helping in, sometimes they ads are less helpful. some of the market, some of them or not. some of them were off message. with your business and marketing efforts. if you have to of a marketing team within your business but also an outside marketing team, how would you feel about your results? probably not very good. you want to target it and develop your message appropriately. i am not saying it was not without some impact. i think it had a lot of impact. but it would have been much more impact so if it were run through the campaign. >> i am being told that is the end of the session. we are going to have dessert and coffee downstairs where we have been having the meetings right outside the general session and the public ag
>> the unions may better advantage of a lot of the super pac money, channeling it into other things. the other issue was obama's advertising. and they made which nobody responded to it. >> it probably did it a difference because >> in the end, mitt romney loss but it does not mean it did not make a difference. many cannot afford a petition campaign and someone else helping in, sometimes they ads are less helpful. some of the market, some of them or not. some of them were off...
189
189
Nov 14, 2012
11/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 189
favorite 0
quote 0
that was mitt romney's plan. it's starting to get traction with democrats. you could end the benefit on second homes and vacation properties or you could eliminate the whole thing all together. obviously the realtors, home builders, anybody making money off housing is opposed to changing this deduction at all. jerry howard, ceo of home builders association, says even the debate is "chilling the market." gary thomas, president over at national association of realtors says the mortgage interest deduction is vital to the stability of the american housing market and the economy. now, whatever cut is adopted, if it's adopted, it would hit those hardest who are at the beginning of a big mortgage and therefore are paying the most in interest. that's how mortgages work. and that is big because so many people have recently refinanced so they are all at the beginning. this one is going to be really interesting. simon? >> thank you very much for that diana. scary. >> interesting. >> thank you very much. we were talking about -- have you seen the tax breaks going on fle
that was mitt romney's plan. it's starting to get traction with democrats. you could end the benefit on second homes and vacation properties or you could eliminate the whole thing all together. obviously the realtors, home builders, anybody making money off housing is opposed to changing this deduction at all. jerry howard, ceo of home builders association, says even the debate is "chilling the market." gary thomas, president over at national association of realtors says the mortgage...